Thursday, January 26, 2006

Hamas wins "Palestinian" elections

So Hamas beats Fatah. How will the US and EU respond? Alot depends on this.

Update: The Belmont Club has a lucid analysis:
Hamas may have won the Palestinian elections, which may in turn make Benjamin Netanyahu the next Prime Minister of Israel. CNN is now reporting that the current Palestinian government has resigned. The election of Hamas taken together with the crisis in Iran suggests that that the world is being challenged by very deeply rooted forces which traditional international institutions may be incapable of handling. The way to safety is hangs on events that haven't resolved themselves yet. Whether the policy of democraticization has blunted the rush to madness -- Egyptian blogger the Big Pharaoah thinks Middle East democracy boosts Islamists ; whether Iran will acquire the bomb; whether Israel will draw its sword to prevent it; whether Syria's ruling dynasty will fall; whether Europe will break out of its demographic death-spiral. Because success relies so much on the exploitation of contingent events it's a dangerous time for America to be divided, with one side unsure of whether any real danger besides BushchimpHitler exists and the other in the grip of a half-articulated policy; both almost fatalistically slouching towards a future where there are no certain or even probable endings.
This sounds familiar...now where did this express itself last? Oh yeah, Iraq....Funny how it has recently been shown that Saddam ran training camps for Al Qaeda terrorists.

Manny Is Here: Hamas wins "Palestinian" elections

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Hamas wins "Palestinian" elections

So Hamas beats Fatah. How will the US and EU respond? Alot depends on this.

Update: The Belmont Club has a lucid analysis:
Hamas may have won the Palestinian elections, which may in turn make Benjamin Netanyahu the next Prime Minister of Israel. CNN is now reporting that the current Palestinian government has resigned. The election of Hamas taken together with the crisis in Iran suggests that that the world is being challenged by very deeply rooted forces which traditional international institutions may be incapable of handling. The way to safety is hangs on events that haven't resolved themselves yet. Whether the policy of democraticization has blunted the rush to madness -- Egyptian blogger the Big Pharaoah thinks Middle East democracy boosts Islamists ; whether Iran will acquire the bomb; whether Israel will draw its sword to prevent it; whether Syria's ruling dynasty will fall; whether Europe will break out of its demographic death-spiral. Because success relies so much on the exploitation of contingent events it's a dangerous time for America to be divided, with one side unsure of whether any real danger besides BushchimpHitler exists and the other in the grip of a half-articulated policy; both almost fatalistically slouching towards a future where there are no certain or even probable endings.
This sounds familiar...now where did this express itself last? Oh yeah, Iraq....Funny how it has recently been shown that Saddam ran training camps for Al Qaeda terrorists.

0 Comments:

<< Home